User talk:Ankit G Dubey

Hello Ankit G Dubey. You used the {{Help me}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{Help me}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access to the channel.

Welcome

Hello, Ankit G Dubey, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 13:39, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Sources

Hi, Ankit, I removed the imdb as a source, as it's specifically banned at WP:RELIABLESOURCES. I'm not sure if this actress is notable, but thanks for your hard work on it. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 10:35, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Image.Jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Image.Jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:30, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Image.Jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Image.Jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Begoon 06:49, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please do not remove file deletion tags from file description pages on Wikipedia, as you did to File:Image.Jpg, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Begoon 08:41, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Kushi (actress) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Specifically, in this case, our WP:NFC rules prohibit pictures of people still alive, groups still active, and buildings still standing; provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image. This includes non-free promotional images.

Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Begoon 08:50, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Image.Jpg

You've placed a tag on the image claiming "This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License.", but you have provided no evidence that the copyright holder has released the image under that license. The url http://nowboxoffice.com/kushi-actress-photos-2/kushi-at-kalavu-thozhirchalai-audio-launch-10/http://nowboxoffice.com is a dead link. Evidence of permission is required before the license can be used on the file. -- Begoon 09:17, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rebecca Attending Audio Launch Of Her Film In 2014.Png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rebecca Attending Audio Launch Of Her Film In 2014.Png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Begoon 20:54, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rebecca Attending Audio Launch Of Her Film In 2014.Png

A tag has been placed on File:Rebecca Attending Audio Launch Of Her Film In 2014.Png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Neil S. Walker (talk) 21:12, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:"Rebecca"Attending Audio Launch Of Her Film in 2014.Png

A tag has been placed on File:"Rebecca"Attending Audio Launch Of Her Film in 2014.Png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Begoon 20:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Block

I have blocked you briefly for repeated copyright violations. If you do more copyvios once the block expires, the next block will be longer. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kushi (actress) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kushi (actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kushi (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 19:48, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

Your addition to Kalavu Thozhirchalai has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

[1] is a blatant copyvio from [2] Pinging RHaworth. -- Begoon 11:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 14:20, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ankit G Dubey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i Didn't Know that How to use and ad content on Wikipedia And i have all the evidence that I have a Copyright and Now Plz unblock Me So I Am Use and edit Wikipedia with Proper guidelines Ankit G Dubey (talk) 14:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your unblock request does not convince me that you understand the issues that led to your block or that you understand the copyright policy of Wikipedia. A future unblock request needs to clearly explain your understanding of the copyright policy and how you will change your edits in the future. only (talk) 15:13, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I note that you have seem to have stopped doing image copyvios which caused your first two blocks. Re your more recent, text copyvio reported above: Begoon was right to reverse your edit. However I think this dupdet report does show an attempt to re-write the source article in your own words. So I have unblocked you. But I consider this your last chance - any further copyvios and I will not help you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:51, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:10, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

: {unblock|reason=My Account Has not used Multiple Account someone Else using the device of Same ip address For Editing So Unblock Me,Because it Was Made Mistakaly Ankit G Dubey (talk) 16:09, 6 January 2018 (UTC)}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ankit G Dubey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My Account Has not used Multiple Account someone Else using the device of Same ip address For Editing So Unblock Me,Because it Was Made Wrongly Ankit G Dubey (talk) 16:09, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You only need to make one unblock request at a time. In any case, this is a procedural decline. This account is not currently blocked. If you are unable to edit, please follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to do so. Yamla (talk) 19:02, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:38, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Kratika Mathur

Draft:Kratika Mathur, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kratika Mathur and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Kratika Mathur during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:43, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:22, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]